Rider model
The central representation Gritmo builds from a rider’s evidence and uses across analysis, course planning, and training.
The Profile explains what the rider model means; it is not a second model.
Loading gritmo…
Gritmo reference
Return to GritmoGritmo reference
The canonical public meanings of the terms Gritmo uses to describe riders, evidence, and training.
One concept should have one public name and one stable meaning. Technical implementation language stays out unless it changes how an estimate should be understood.
01
The central representation Gritmo builds from a rider’s evidence and uses across analysis, course planning, and training.
The Profile explains what the rider model means; it is not a second model.
Observed information that supports or changes the rider model.
Evidence may come from rides, power bests, files, connected providers, or values entered by the rider.
The highest credible average power a rider has produced for a specific duration.
Power bests are evidence. They are not a separate rider model.
A value directly supported by recorded or rider-provided evidence.
Observed efforts remain points; Gritmo does not connect sparse points and call the result observed.
An estimate produced by applying a defined relationship to the available evidence.
A modeled value is useful when its evidence, scope, and limits remain visible.
How strongly the available evidence supports an estimate.
Confidence describes the estimate, not the ability or value of the rider.
02
The boundary above which fatigue cannot stabilize and modeled W′ begins to drain.
CP is not exactly FTP, 60-minute power, or a promise of indefinitely sustainable power.
The finite amount of modeled work a rider can perform above CP.
W′ is not a literal tank, a single substrate store, or a purely anaerobic reserve.
An estimate of how much above-CP work capacity remains as work and recovery unfold.
W′ balance is calculated from the rider model and power trace. It is not a direct measurement of remaining physiology.
Ability to preserve performance after accumulated fatigue.
Without relevant late-Ride evidence, Durability is unknown—not weak.
Ability to reproduce hard efforts.
A large W′ does not automatically imply strong Repeatability.
03
The interpretation of what the rider model currently means about the rider.
Profile is not another name for Account and not a second rider model.
One recorded cycling session.
Activity remains valid internal or provider language, but the cycling product calls it a Ride.
A saved or rideable path used for planning, following, or trainer execution.
Route may remain an internal geometry term. Segment is reserved for a measured portion of a Course.
A rider-specific plan for distributing effort across a Course.
Strategy describes the planned effort, not the Course geometry itself.
The rider quality or adaptation that training is intended to develop.
A Training target describes what should improve; a Workout method describes how.
The session structure or intensity used to pursue a Training target.
Sweet Spot, Threshold, and Microbursts are methods—not rider adaptations.